Hot Issues
spacer
Royal Commission report makes super fee recommendations
spacer
Four tips for boosting your super balance
spacer
New Year resolutions, New Year strategies
spacer
Part 4 - The major benefit of ‘behavioural coaching'
spacer
3 tips for weathering the market's bumpy ride
spacer
Common BDBN ‘pitfalls’ flagged in wake of ASIC action
spacer
Case law points to ‘growing importance’ of SMSF document chain
spacer
How Australia is performing.
spacer
Global outlook summary: Down but not out
spacer
Australia - a comprehensive run-down of our vital statistics.
spacer
Your guide to smarter holiday reading
spacer
Verifying asset values in a SMSF.
spacer
Admin, BDBN errors flagged for SMSFs this year
spacer
ATO targets non-arm's length income - NALI
spacer
Retiring in their 30s or 40s?
spacer
Ranking of the world's best: Taking it personally
spacer
The value of advice - Behavioural Coaching
spacer
Our Advent calendar for 2018
spacer
Compliance, tax advice in strongest demand from SMSFs
spacer
Stop!! Don't do a paper Budget, use our online budgeting tools instead.
spacer
Franking credit policy to dent retirement savings by 15 per cent
spacer
Information needed to be the BBQ expert.
spacer
Hungry for income? Choose carefully.
spacer
Retiree self-protection: A volatility-and-downturn 'bucket'
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Verifying asset values in a SMSF.

ATO issues fresh warning on valuations after major cases.

       

 

The ATO has reminded SMSF auditors on their obligations around verifying asset values in the financial statements of SMSFs following the outcome of two cases this year.

In an online update, the ATO stated that under 8.02B of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SISR), assets must be valued at market value in the SMSF’s accounts and statements. 

“Two recent cases involving SMSF auditors, Cam & Bear Pty Ltd v McGoldrick [2018] NSWCA 110 and Ryan Wealth Holdings Pty Ltd v Baumgartner [2018] NSWSC 1502, [have] highlighted the obligation of SMSF auditors to verify asset values in the financial statements,” the ATO stated.

The two court cases held SMSF auditors responsible for investment losses. The Cam & Bear Pty Ltd v McGoldrick case was a decision by the NSW Court of Appeal, which ruled that the auditor was negligent in failing to make proper enquiries as to the recoverability of certain investments held in the fund and report back to the trustee.

The second, more recent case, Ryan Wealth Holdings Pty Ltd v Baumgartner, similarly found that the auditor’s failure to detect irregularities in the fund over a number of years meant the SMSF trustee was unable to redeem money lost on a series of unsecured loans.

The ATO stressed that SMSF auditors need to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence from SMSF trustees to verify the value of a fund’s investments.

While the ATO said that it is not the auditor’s job to undertake a valuation, it said that they should seek evidence that shows how the asset was valued, including the method used and the data relied upon.

“If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient verification that material assets are valued at market value, they should qualify the financial and compliance report sections of their SMSF independent auditor’s report stating they have been unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to verify the asset values,” the tax office said.

They should also lodge an auditor or actuary contravention report for the contravention and notify the trustees in a management letter, the ATO stated.

The ATO noted that the most common contravention not identified or reported by auditors who were referred to ASIC this year was regulation 8.02B.

SuperConcepts executive manager of SMSF technical and private wealth Graeme Colley previously told SMSF Adviser that where there is limited evidence supplied to the auditor about assets, especially more complex ones, then the fund could be hit with a contravention.

“Next year, advisers and trustees will be required to provide more thorough and comprehensive information to auditors so that they’re satisfied that the fund has made an investment which is recoverable,” Mr Colley said.

“That’s really important, because if the auditor is not satisfied or they can’t see that it’s recoverable, then they’ll likely qualify the accounts of the fund, fill out a contravention report and let the ATO work out whether the investment is recoverable under the operation of the SIS legislation.”

 

Miranda Brownlee
19 December 2018
smsfadviser.com

Gippsland Office : 35 Hotham St, Traralgon, Vic, 3844 | Melbourne Office : Mooroolbark (PO Box 276, Chirnside Park VIC 3116) | Telephone : 03 5174 1233
Brent Van Der Wel (348-148) is an authorised representative of AIW Dealer Services Pty Ltd Australian Financial Services Licence No 414256.